Inlägg

Robert Greene on The will of expansion, influence, power etc.

 The will of expansion, influence, power etc. A s Friedrich Nietzsche pu t is, the longing for wholeness makes all things “strive toward the immeasurable in nature, individual character rarely is fixed, but instead constantly expanding.” Jordan Peterson says he’s shocked about the some of the laws. Especially since Jordan is a preacher of speaking the truth. Jordan “It is shocking, these are very manipulative” Greene answer, >>Yes<< Greene is however examining the shadow of us humans. All humans all have it, either unconsciously or consciously aware of it . Here are Robert Greene comments about some of his rules in the book The 48 laws on Power , here in this Jordan B. Peterson podcast: ” The idea for me comes from Nietzsche and his idea of Will to Power which he explains as every organism has the desire to expand, has a desire of expansion. And so I think for human beings the desire that we have this innate propensity for wanting to expand beyond our limits. We want

Jordan Peterson thoughts on Ayn Rand

Bild
Ayn Rand great mind or just simplifying maneuvers If moral involved, not art but propaganda? So Ayn Rand has tried to simplyfy the complex to the simple. But does she have wrong starting premise? I dont know, I'm just trying to find the best ideas that work practically. The thruth is though hard to find, but the truth in itself is simple. So at least she tries, and it does sound p retty logical considering she is right on her first premis. There are a lot of people who tries to make themself out to be smarter than Ayn Rand, but hardly give anny good argument or give some other result.  Just says that she wasnt a great mind or something of that sort. Well I don't know. It is often above my head, but at least I try to find the persons who has the best reasoning. I can see Jordans Point, or his subjective thought about Ayns literature, but I dont know if it's has any value actually. Perhaps I'm a bit harsch, but he has to give something more to counter Ayn's premise. L